According to Sky Sports: Chelsea have had talks with England’s rugby chiefs about moving to the Twickenham stadium for a season while Stamford Bridge is redeveloped.
The Rugby football union have confirmed they have had talks with Chelsea but it’s still in the early stage.
According to Sunday Times, the RFU said: “We are regularly contacted by a variety of organisations, within and outside sport, on a wide range of opportunities concerning the use of what we believe is a world-class stadium.
“We have had an inquiry from Chelsea FC but have not had any discussions of any substance.
The Blues are on the hunt for a home for a season, with Stamford Bridge set to undergo redevelopments from 41,000 to 60,000.
A Chelsea spokesman told the Sunday Times: “We’re investigating different scenarios as part of the consultation process we started earlier this year, but have had no discussions of substance so far.”
Let’s have your opinion on this.
Question: Should Chelsea move temporarily to Twickenham or stay at the bridge?
Twickenham would be interesting
Amir Sibboni – http://www.linkedin.com/pub/amir-sibboni/93/35a/6b1/